It is devastating’: the way 30 confined beluga whales have become bargaining chips in dispute over animal welfare.
Jelly Bean’s offspring Bertie is an cute little “playful character”. Orion – called “Onion Ring” – is a sizeable but fiercely protective companion. Another whale, Zephyr has “constant motion” and sways like a wiggly creature. Lillooet the beluga is the “biggest cuddle bug” with a gentle spirit.
A group of thirty captive beluga whales in a Canadian entertainment facility have been entangled in a struggle between a shuttered park, local and national governments and animal rights activists.
But those most familiar with the whales say the intense debate over their destiny often fails to consider the individual traits of the whales who, after spending their lives in enclosed habitats, have been thoroughly researched by the caretakers who interact with them daily.
After the federal government disallowed the export of the belugas to a foreign facility, the controversial facility near Niagara Falls where they are held warned to end their lives unless the government pays for the cost of their survival. The nation’s fisheries minister has refused that request, placing the thirty whales in an dangerously unstable situation.
Intelligent Sea Creatures
Researchers say that beluga whales’ neural makeup, along with their sound replication, intellectual tasks and communal behavior indicate they are deeply intelligent mammals – something Kristy Burgess discovered directly.
She spent three years as a marine mammal specialist, a job that required earning the trust of the sea creatures.
“Establishing those bonds over time takes a lot of consistency and a lot of care. At the beginning, they’re very wary of you,” she said. “In time, you gain shared confidence. And they start being more open with you. It’s just so magical and fulfilling.”
The trainer knew the whales were exceptionally cognitive, but she says she was even so amazed by the subtleties and quirks in their dispositions. She developed a particular love for a pair of whales with contrasting personalities.
“One whale accepted me. The other made me earn it,” she said. “They altered the way I understand relationships.”
Growing Opposition and Facility Decline
Her interaction with the whales evolved against a background of increasing societal concern to their captivity.
During her three years at the facility, multiple belugas and the park’s one killer whale, Kiska, succumbed. In total, 19 belugas have perished at the park since recent years, a statistic which the park attributes to expected lifespan, but which campaigners say reflects the inadequate care in which they were housed.
The facility did not operate to the visitors over the summer, but Burgess says she witnessed firsthand effects of the closure. “Concrete is deteriorating from the pools because they’re degrading and not being fixed. The whales are curious and so they grab fragments and navigate with chunks in their mouth. It’s heartbreaking to see.”
The park did not respond to a questionnaire, but earlier stated: “The whales … receive far higher quality medical attention and around the clock care than any human in the United Kingdom, or anywhere else.”
Fate in Limbo and Potential Resolutions
The former employee was dismissed from the facility in early March following the passing of a beluga, an sick beluga the caretakers had to put down. She said the facility believed particulars of the death were disclosed to the news outlets and she was fired shortly thereafter.
The ambiguity over the whales’ future has left Burgess and staff members in distress. She says the facility’s ultimatum to kill its whales is a bargaining chip and is a “practically unfeasible” endeavor, adding any attempts to euthanize even a individual beluga would require “significant manpower”, equipment and heavy equipment.
“It’s impossible in hell the caretakers would ever do it,” she said.
Burgess backs calls for the whales to be removed immediately from the facility, with its crumbling tanks and reduced personnel.
In recent months, the nation’s fisheries minister denied a bid to send the whales to China.
“Granting the application would have meant a perpetual existence in confinement and a return to display for amusement,” the official commented. “As society, we know that marine mammals are meant for the sea, not in tanks for our enjoyment. I could not in good conscience permit an relocation that would perpetuate the conditions these belugas have endured.”
But the former trainer said the official’s statements indicate a broader lack of awareness of the realities of life for belugas born in captivity.
“The society needs to realize these are whales that have spent their whole lives in confinement and they will need ongoing assistance for the rest of their years,” she said. “Many just don’t realize that it’s not as easy as saying ‘close it down’.”
Alternative Habitat and Continuing Discussion
As authorities struggle to find a answer, proposals have been put forward, some of which have little basis in reality. An idea called for the belugas to be freed into the open waters of Canada’s north – where whales are a key source of sustenance for Inuit communities.
A suggested refuge in the region of eastern Canada, which now received official endorsement, has shown to be contentious. The planned site, which includes 100 acres of enclosed sea water, doesn’t yet exist. Proponents remain positive that it could in time represent a sustainable solution for some of the whales.
But, Burgess says, among trainers she’s consulted, there is “no trust there” about what she said is “only an trial” in the whales’ fate.
Some experts say the prospect of a sanctuary indicates a changing attitudes away from animal displays and could represent a feasible plan in the short term.
Charles Vinick, director of the initiative, said the location will mimic the cognitive activities and feeding regimen the whales get from caretakers, albeit in a significantly bigger space. He said after the well-being of whales is fully assessed, which could take months|an extended period|