Pressure, Fear and Hope as India's financial capital Slum Dwellers Confront Demolition
Across several weeks, intimidating phone calls continued. Initially, allegedly from a former police officer and a retired army general, subsequently from the authorities. Finally, one resident states he was summoned to law enforcement headquarters and told clearly: remain silent or experience severe repercussions.
The leather artisan is one of many resisting a high-value redevelopment plan where this historic settlement β an iconic Mumbai neighborhood β faces bulldozed and redeveloped by a corporate giant.
"The culture of the slum is unparalleled in the world," explains the resident. "Yet the plan aims to destroy our social fabric and stop us speaking out."
Opposing Environments
The narrow alleys of this community sit in stark contrast to the soaring skyscrapers and luxury apartments that dominate the settlement. Homes are assembled randomly and frequently lacking adequate facilities, informal businesses emit toxic smoke and the environment is saturated with the unpleasant stench of open sewers.
Among some individuals, the promise of a renewed Dharavi into a developed area of high-end towers, organized recreational areas, shiny shopping centers and homes with two toilets is an optimistic future realized.
"There's no sufficient health services, proper streets or drainage and we have no places for kids to enjoy," states A Selvin Nadar, 56, who relocated from southern India in 1982. "The only way is to tear it all down and construct proper housing."
Community Resistance
But others, including this protester, are opposing the project.
Everyone acknowledges that the slum, historically ignored as an illegal encroachment, is urgently needing investment and development. Yet they fear that this plan β without community input β might turn a piece of prime Mumbai real estate into an elite enclave, displacing the lower-caste, working-class residents who have been there since the nineteenth century.
This involved these marginalized, relocated individuals who established the vacant wetlands into a frequently examined example of local enterprise and commercial output, whose output is estimated at between $1m and two million dollars per year, making it a major unregulated sectors.
Relocation Worries
Among approximately one million people living in the packed sprawling zone, a minority will be able for alternative accommodation in the redevelopment, which is estimated to take an extended timeframe to accomplish. The remainder will be relocated to barren areas and salt plains on the distant periphery of the metropolis, potentially break up a long-established community. A portion will receive no homes at all.
People eligible to remain in the area will be allocated apartments in high-rise buildings, a major break from the natural, shared lifestyle of residing and operating that has sustained Dharavi for many years.
Industries from garment work to clay work and recycling are expected to decrease in quantity and be moved to an allocated "commercial zone" distant from people's residences.
Livelihood Crisis
For residents like Shaikh, a workshop owner and long-time of his family to live in Dharavi, the plan presents an existential threat. His makeshift, three-storey workshop produces garments β formal jackets, premium outerwear, decorated jackets β sold in high-end shops in south Mumbai and abroad.
Household members lives in the rooms downstairs and laborers and tailors β workers from different regions β reside in the same building, enabling him to manage costs. Beyond Dharavi's enclave, housing costs are frequently tenfold as high for minimal space.
Pressure and Coercion
At the government offices nearby, a conceptual model of the transformation initiative illustrates a very different outlook. Well-groomed people move around on two-wheelers and electric vehicles, purchasing western-style baguettes and croissants and having coffee on a patio adjacent to a coffee shop and treat station. This represents a world away from the affordable idli sambar breakfast and 5-rupee chai that sustains local residents.
"This isn't development for residents," explains Shaikh. "It represents a massive property transaction that will render it impossible for residents to remain."
Additionally, there exists concern of the development company. Managed by a powerful tycoon β a leading figure and a supporter of the Indian prime minister β the business group has been subject to claims of favoritism and questionable practices, which it denies.
While administrative bodies labels it a collaborative effort, the developer contributed $950m for its majority share. A case claiming that the redevelopment was questionably assigned to the business group is pending in the top court.
Ongoing Pressure
After they started to vocally oppose the project, local opponents assert they have been subjected to an extended period of harassment and intimidation β comprising phone calls, explicit warnings and suggestions that criticizing the project was tantamount to opposing national interests β by figures they assert work for the corporate group.
Part of the group alleged to have issuing the threats is {a retired police officer|a former law enforcement official|an ex-c